Non-negotiable positions

While learning is our primary vocation, where open mindedness is a necessity, there are some iron principles learned from Plan B implementation experience for which compromise is impossible, our position inflexible. It is a condition of our professional license as the engineer of record to withdraw from a project destined to fail, and we are required to know early-on when that is the case. We have ricocheted to the level of its central cause, found it, fixed it, and validated the fix by multiple implementations, all available to you for examination and evaluation on living implementations.

The world societies are an unmitigated mess of dysfunction on a grand scale, fractal, reflected in the health of their citizens. The cause of this global health calamity cannot be found amongst its wreckage (Gödel/Einstein). It resides in a level of abstraction above the level of the carnage. The industrial capitalist revolution has undermined and toppled institutions of all sizes and ages, taking with them benevolent systems of authority, status, belief, and community.

The generic fix for Plan A, Plan B, is our benchmark for making progress. Towards that end there is nothing in dissecting the cadavers of Plan A that can be useful. Plan A is fractally wrong. Our position regarding this website offering is to emphasize the knowledge of Plan B and keep the knowledge of Plan A in perspective as the unavoidable consequences for getting social flourishing wrong. When you live the happy excitements of Plan B every day, as we do, following the shenanigans of Plan A is ludicrous.

The elements of our non-negotiable position we call stop rules. Violation of a stop rule automatically scrubs the project. NASA learned about stop rules for launching rockets the hard way.  For Plan A NASA, it took the loss of two shuttles to get there. The stop rules for Plan B are widely distributed before the A-B process, FLLP, is launched.

The prime directive

Our apex stop rule is orientation to the operational reality. If you are not fully centered on the authentic causes and effects of social dynamics, any engagement with Plan B ideology will be lose lose. People who deny reality cannot improve themselves and no one can attain and sustain happiness for them.  The pilgrimage to happiness is tough enough for the reality-centered. For those in reality denial, it’s the pursuit of the impossible. Disconnect and distance.

Progress killers

  • No Front End, reality check
  • Responsibility without autonomy
  • Autonomy without outcome responsibility. The CEO has autonomy and is not held responsible for the outcomes of his counterproductive management practices.
  • Attempting to defy a natural law or human nature
  • Meddling by authoritarians
  • Arbitrarily skipping steps in the GYAT sequence
  • Suppression of inalienable human rights
  • Undiscussables, opacity

 

Unobtainium

  • Status quo forever
  • Garbage in, correct answers out.
  • Cause in consequences
  • Social intelligence limitation
  • Trust by force
  • Creativity by force
  • Responsibility by force
  • Selective relief from natural law
  • Remote personalization
  • Infallibility, omnipotence
  • Zero risk
  • Trustworthy, prudent subconscious-mind imperatives

The need for a sense of universal responsibility affects every aspect of modern life. Dali lama

Core beliefs

  • Moral progress does not require the human mind to be naturally free of selfish motives, only that it has other motives to counteract them
  • Responsibility does not require behavior to be uncaused, only that it respond to praise and blame
  • Meaning in life does not require that the process that shaped the brain must have a purpose, only that the brain itself must have purposes
  • Political equality does not require sameness, but policies that treat people as individuals with rights

When goal-seeking performance is the principal measure, personality variations don’t matter to the producers. If goal-seeking performance doesn’t count towards social status, only individual differences in reality denial matter. W. Livingston 2014

For the producer, there are two riddles blocking the way to a flourishing Plan B that must be answered to attain it.

  1. Technical – material, reality multiplicity, complexity, connectivity, covariance
  2. Psychological-entangled, socio-pathology, species genome

These impasses have little in common except the innate limitations of the brain. To solve one riddle provides no traction for solving the other. The dominion of the material barrier is natural law, mathematical physics. The sphere of the psychological barrier is human nature, our Stone Age DNA.

Having been through the war for flourishing, we have a hard position on each barrier. We are intolerant of positions and practices proven to be counterproductive 100% of the time. We have been punished by Nature for attempting to defy her ecosystem laws. While we welcome feedback of any sort, we don’t engage with hard-core entitled consumers in reality denial

The conception of a community as consisting of castes or classes whose interests are naturally opposed is scientifically false and politically dangerous. When their vision is limited by a wrong conception of the group, it can lead only to anarchy and disintegration. Aristotle, 320 BCE

Position on barrier multiplicity

Our stipulation on Plan B has been sealed by successful implementations using a battlefield-proven generic paradigm. The riddle of impasse one, material-reality multiplicity, has been solved. It had to be solved before the impasse two riddle identified itself. The hidden second barrier is an ambush T-Rex carnivore.

The evidence for the claims is far more extraordinary than the windfall claims themselves. No effort will be made to explain, derive, or justify Plan B beyond the website galleries herein. Success features transparency and scrutable connectivity to natural law. Invitation to examine and evaluate active implementations completes our duty to Popper Plan B. Superior validation to hands-on, that the first riddle has been solved, is impossible. That’s why it’s incontrovertible (Popper).

The logic for validation by auditing implementations is solid. Proof by any other means, such as mathematical physics, can be denied with “Show me.” If it’s true, it has to be materially demonstrable. In that regard, the concepts of Plan B can be demonstrated using your shop anywhere, anytime. You will discover that “show me” is a big lie. Opinions have no traction with indifferent natural law. Entitled consumers have no interest in learning about the natural laws that channel their lives.

Position on barrier socio-pathology

Since 2014, All efforts in our R&D have been focused on the psychological prime movers, the socio-pathology of Plan B rejection. Rejecting Plan B is rejecting the reality of workforce health.

This impasse to Plan B proliferation is, by far, the most complex riddle in sociology. In the last year alone, over eight new dimensions to the barrier have been uncovered. While it’s always good to learn about the previously-unrecognized dimensions, the complexity of variable, circulating interactions makes for mind-blowing multi-dimensional profusion.

To wit. Does your depletion in brain glucose from protracted cognitive focus instruct your endocrine system to escalate the stress of fear? Does your migraine deaden your analytical skills? Are you having a “bad” day? There’s no end to the network of factors that impinge on the choice to go Plan B, or not. Experience proved that the only level that has no stake in social status is the workmaster keystone. All other levels are fixated on social status, engaging in counterfeit zero-sum competition for social status where the winners and losers are always in reality denial.

For multi-dimensional riddles like the invisible social dysfunction network, the only procedure of building knowledge for this impasse is the process of elimination. It is easy to identify those “solutions” that repeatedly failed. It is harder to accept that all “solutions” offered by academia and marketing agencies, have failed miserably. Nothing from the conventional playbook has succeeded. Nothing.

Our position on riddle two is to leave it be. We work with the possible (producers) and avoid diluting our efforts pursuing the impossible (entitled authorities). The final impasse is classified as a constraint in perpetuity. Reality-deniers can have no role in bringing prosperity to the organization.

Our dismal record with impasse two, 1980-2020, served to validate the principles.

  • 500 documented contacts with authors to build knowledge in their field. Zero response
  • 3,000 documented contacts with plan A headsheds for raising productivity. Zero response
  • 600 documented technical conference presentations (1970-2013) promoting better way. Zero response
  • 2,000 documented contacts with venture capitalists. Zero response
  • 250 documented contacts with tort lawyers. Negligible response.

The primary learning mode in Plan B think is the process of elimination. For anything significant, it’s always run, break, and fix (RBF).  Through massive daily use, we have turned RBF into an artform.

To achieve a social condition that will subsume castes and classes under a community of interest and purpose, human nature may be trusted to work out a gradual solution once the attempt to find political nostrums and ad hoc remedies are abandoned. The very foundation of a just society is a will to collaborate amongst its members. Will, not force, is the basis of Plan B. Elton Mayo

On ideology

  1. It must have power over cognition;
  2. It must be capable of guiding one’s evaluations;
  3. It must provide guidance towards action
  4. It must be logically coherent.

The process of elimination

The values that consumers use in choosing to reject Plan B, POSIWID, do not include:

  • Productivity
  • Prosperity
  • Health
  • Welfare
  • Ecological security
  • Safety
  • Quality
  • Inalienable rights
    • The pursuit of happiness
    • Liberty
    • Life
  • Materiality, greed
  • Morality, benevolence
  • Legality
  • Security
  • Survival of the species

Any time you wish to learn the root cause of Plan A carnage, it’s available on this website. For some philosophy on happiness, for Plan B news.

Requirements of Plan B

Equal opportunity for psychological success

  • No opinions, a priori
  • No losers, no zero sum
  • Inalienable rights
  • Social status by performance
  • Choice-making by producers
  • Identification of significant variables
  • A square deal
  • Transparency
  • No class distinctions

The requisites for Plan B

  1. Negotiating the opinion-free path of prudent choice-making
  2. Application of the social intelligence that enables the journey

NEXT

Hits: 79