You have reached the man-in-the-middle opening page. Now that you’re here, should you have come?
Up until the start of the Eastern European (E2) war on Feb. 24, 2022, this website was arranged in conformance to conventional expectations for orderly, progressive knowledge transfer, from simple to complex. Its page has been preserved for reference purposes.
The E2 war has provided incontrovertible validation of the central theme of our life’s work so vivid and on-target that it answers all questions about the value of learning about social dynamics in the operational reality – why it was fortunate and prudent for you to arrive here.
Understanding social dynamics in hierarchies, featured subject on this website, helps you see that the difference between the two possible stable human social systems, a languishing autocracy (Plan A) and a flourishing (Plan B) society, is determining who will win the E2 war in real time. Fundamentals:
- Two flourishing social systems (+-, +-) have no reason to go to war. They are in positive reciprocity mode, mutually benefiting from the relationship.
- Two languishing social systems (++,++ or –,–) always have plenty or reasons to go to war with each other, even though doing so means mutual destruction with huge losses on both sides. The payoff to the victor, if any, is a tiny fraction of his cost for conducting the war.
- Any war between a languishing autocratic Plan A nation (++,++ or –,–) and a mobilized Plan B nation (+-) can only be won by the Plan B military, equipped appropriately for Plan B warfare. That is, the Plan B military system cannot lose against a top-down command and control Plan A military. The ratio of soldiers lost in direct combat between Plan A military and Plan B military exceeds a hundred to one. Since Plan B wages war at night, as it does in daytime, the losses to Plan A grow at that ratio around the clock.
Plan A military, top-down command and control, establishes stationary command centers, supply depots, airports, hospitals, maintenance shops and large assemblages of soldiers and equipment. Plan B military places command and control with autonomy and unrestricted tactical decision making authority with small mobile teams. They are at liberty to engage the enemy when, how, and as they see fit. Videos taken of their performance are uploaded to central records all day every day. Plan A invaders find they only have stationary civilian targets to shoot at. The destruction of a high-rise condo makes the news but it doesn’t win wars.
In an incredible happenstance, this war ongoing between two Nations, (E2), one classical Plan A and the other classical Plan B is playing out the sociotechnology we have developed working with industry over decades. We had the necessary and sufficient organizational dynamics knowledge in hand and experience, placed on this website since 2018, before the E2 conflict began – Plan A nation invading a Plan B nation. What we did not have was operational validation that the Plan B military was operationally established to specification, functioning as the ideology guarantees.
By February 28, 2022, combat performance was sufficiently measured that Plan B military was declared functional and we posted and dated the prediction of Plan B military victory over classic Plan A military on this page in full confidence. Months later, unprecedented quantities of video evidence of the B-A performance advantage is beyond dispute, common knowledge. Every day, as Plan A forces are exterminated, Plan B forces increase in numbers and lethality. Plan A morale is below zero. Meanwhile, Plan B personnel, empowered, self-directed, and with no turnover, get more creative and productive every day in ways to eradicate more of the plan A invaders, called ORCS (Tolkien Hobbit).
What is now on world stage for all to see is the end of Plan A vs Plan A – conventional warfare. Whenever Plan A invades a Plan B military, Plan A loses to Plan B. The certainty is not established by opinion and experience but by mathematical physics. Plan A nations will not learn the lessons of E2 for a long time, if ever, preferring to go extinct than abandon autocracy.
Now that the distinguishing differences between Plan A and Plan B have been unconditionally validated in real time, forecasting becomes mandatory. Validating an ideology cannot be done in hindsight. You must put forth the future the ideology predicts so it can be used as a measuring benchmark (Popper). Note that the popular 1945 prediction the atomic bomb would eradicate conventional warfare did not pan out.
It’s well understood as common sense that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Seeing that this website is loaded with extraordinary claims, it is fortunate indeed to have extraordinary evidence, displayed world-wide at the scale of warfare between two major nations, validating our claims and predictions to the letter.
In this dated and filed disclosure, we are, in effect, patenting the Plan B sociotechnical ideology, being the first to publish its formation from Plan A material, process, and value. We predict it will be a long time before another “discovers” the importance of social system ideology, sociotechnology, on organizational behavior and applies for recognition. A few have already recognized the impact of E2 on changing how war will be conducted in the future but are clueless about the mechanisms of action in play.
- The extinction of conventional warfare has begun
- The military/industrial complex will progressively diminish in size.
- When the military of a nation goes Plan B, the Establishment will change itself to accommodate Plan B. It has no choice. That brings benefits of its own.
- Nations that go Plan B will flourish. Class distinctions will not.
With an empowered mobile enemy dispersed in small groups over large geographical areas equipped with hand-held means to take out vehicles on land, air, and sea, as well as troops in trenches – day and night, the cost/benefit analysis of sophisticated battle systems becomes lop-sided. One attack helicopter costs you $50M to field and one $10K Stinger takes it out of action. Keep doing the math on tanks, aircraft carriers, long-range missiles, and supersonic fighter jets. Everyone in a tank or helicopter gets killed. No Plan B combatant gets injured because he immediately moves intact to the next target area before conventional reactionary military can respond to his previous location.
Since any nation can opt for a Plan B military, what is the justification for stealth bombers? Of what value is the armada of warships against an enemy arrayed in tiny bits scattered about hundreds of square miles continuously on the move? A squadron of supersonic fighter jets? Cruise missiles? A MOAB? A military that can only lose a war to a Plan B military a tenth its size?
While the USA military/industrial complex will fight any reduction in massive weapon systems, the infantry will be clamoring ever stronger for advanced Plan B gear and battlefront autonomy. The soldier has found out he doesn’t have to die for his country to defend it from invaders.
One big weapon system to keep is the nuclear submarine fleet. It provides the ultimate deterrent to nuclear attack. Still the defense budget can be cut in half and the effectiveness doubled.
There is only one Plan B ideology. There can be only one Plan B ideology. It is based on mathematical physics, not opinions, and it is generic because nature’s laws are universal. The military version is exactly the same as the industrial version, which is why both win wars. We have shown by many implementations and demonstrations that it is as invariant as the human nature it is based on. We recognized E2 for what it really was because our experience bringing Plan B to dysfunctional Plan A organizations, since 2013, aligned 100%.
This grand-scale E2 experiment/example has also shown that the mass of credentialed experts, the Pentagon, CIA, NSA, etc., are clueless about the sociotechnology of human hierarchies. Plan B in E2 has given them catatonia, not enlightenment. Having only Plan A vs Plan A experience, their hindsight-based predictions have given them away as imposter-syndrome frauds. Nobody, anywhere in the media or academia worldwide has seen E2 from the sociotechnology perspective as marking the beginning of the end of conventional warfare, forever.
We cannot, however, predict the timetable of transformation. Every nation will be different with Finland likely to be the next.
We are also fortunate to have an associate and renowned military historian, a West Point graduate with direct daily feeds from E2 combat action via his special-forces son. He is a professional engineer and a Plan B interventionist. You will find the ground-truth details that make up his conclusions wide-ranging and fascinating. On his page, currently in process, he structures and exhibits the abundance of evidence why our outcome predictions were foresight nobrainers, incontrovertible. Nothing he does is magic. Nothing is beyond your ken. You can learn to do the same. It is the ultimate in human enlightenment.